🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.